Summary: A comparison for choosing an enterprise NAS in terms of user count, disk layout (RAID), backup needs, virtualization and software ecosystem.
Most businesses that say "we'll buy a NAS" pick a random model from the store and bring it to the office. A few months later capacity runs out, performance falls short or the backup strategy doesn't hold. Choosing the right NAS requires needs analysis before hardware.
1. The use case first
A NAS can take on one or more of these roles:
- Central file storage and sharing
- Backup server (Active Backup, Veeam target)
- File synchronization (Synology Drive)
- Surveillance recording (IP camera recording)
- Virtualization (running VMs)
- Application server (Docker, web)
Whichever of these you expect, you should choose the model accordingly.
2. User count and concurrent access
While a "2-bay entry NAS" suits 5 users, a 50-user design studio needs an 8+ bay model with 10 GbE. The number of concurrent connections and the workload type determine the CPU/RAM choice.
3. Disk layout (RAID) and capacity planning
The misconception that "disk size shows usable capacity" is very common. Depending on the RAID level, a large portion is spent on redundancy:
- RAID 1: 50% of capacity usable (tolerates 1 disk failure)
- RAID 5: (N-1)/N of capacity (1 disk failure)
- RAID 6 / SHR-2: tolerates 2 disk failures, slightly less capacity
Synology's SHR (Synology Hybrid RAID) enables flexible use with mixed disk sizes; it wastes less space compared to classic RAID levels.
4. Disk brand and class
Don't put desktop disks like WD Blue or Seagate Barracuda in a NAS. NAS-class disks (WD Red Plus/Pro, Seagate IronWolf, Toshiba N300) are designed for 24/7 operation, vibration and TLER. Otherwise you'll see disk deaths within 6-12 months.
5. Synology vs QNAP — what fits where?
Synology
- Strongest in software maturity and ease of use
- The DSM ecosystem is extremely stable
- Excellent backup with Active Backup for Business (free!)
- More conservative hardware — sometimes very fast CPU/10GbE stays pricey
For those who say "it shouldn't need an expert to use — keep it simple and stable," the choice is usually Synology.
QNAP
- Generally more powerful/aggressively priced on hardware
- ZFS file system with QuTS Hero (data integrity, advanced snapshots)
- Strong virtualization and container-hosting capabilities
- Broader on the software-flexibility side but sometimes complex
For virtualization, advanced storage and performance/cost-focused projects, the choice is usually QNAP.
6. The backup strategy comes before the NAS
Don't fall for the "we bought a NAS, our backup is sorted" fallacy. A NAS is primary storage; it's not a backup on its own. In a 3-2-1 backup strategy the NAS is an important player but not sufficient by itself.
7. Network and UPS
- Connecting the NAS to a link below Gigabit throttles performance
- If multiple users access heavily, 2.5 GbE or 10 GbE should be considered
- Don't consider a NAS without a UPS — RAID corruption during a power outage is a serious risk
A clear answer requires user count, workload and growth plan. For most SMBs we meet in the field, models in the Synology DS1522+ or QNAP TS-464 class are a balanced start — but this varies with your situation.
As part of our NAS solutions we analyze your needs, recommend the right model and disk layout, and manage everything from installation to backup integration.
Get a free assessment for the right NAS model
As an authorized Synology and QNAP partner, let us recommend the device best suited to your needs.
Request a Free Assessment